Media nonsense

The Evening Standard has printed a very inaccurate and misleading report on antique firearms.

It follows on from an arrest in London a few days ago.  I am not going to comment on that case because it sub judice but I am going to comment on the misleading statements in the report, which give a completely false impression of the law surrounding antique firearms.

The author implies that Tommy guns and Browning HiPower pistols may be owned as antiques.  This far fetched nonsense.  These remain section 5 prohibited firearms and absolutely nothing in the antiques exemption changes that situation.  There is no “loop hole” in the law.

The head of Nablis is quoted as saying “Our concern is that at the moment you are entitled to walk down the street with an antique firearm capable of firing real bullets”, a statement which is seriously disingenuous and misleading.  If someone were to be found with an antique revolver in a shoulder holster in a public place, then the “curio or ornament” exemption would be void and the person carrying the gun could be prosecuted, regardless of whether it was loaded.

He goes on to say “We are finding criminals with a knowledge of the law. They recognise that they can carry these weapons with little or no risk of jail.”.  If that is the case then that is down to the incompetence of prosecutors who have the legal tools at their disposal to deal with criminals who carry antique firearms to threaten and intimidate.  I suggest that Clive Robinson acquaints himself with them.

The article is correct that antique firearms can be bought at arms and militaria fairs on the continent.  They can also be bought at arms and militaria fairs in the UK.  The photograph in the article implies that Thompsons, Uzis, sawn off shotguns, Browning HiPower pistols and the like can be bought freely on the continent.  This is seriously misleading and untrue.  They cannot.

The law on antique firearms has stood since the Pistols Act of 1903 and is robust and protects public safety.  It has stood the test of time. The only case we know of where an antique firearm has been used in crime was in the murder of bandsman Lee Rigby, where one of the terrorists was armed with an antique KNIL Dutch service revolver.  When he attempted to use the gun, it blew up taking half his hand with it.  Which rather proves the point that antique firearms are no threat to public safety but may be a threat to criminally inclined morons who try to make them work.

There has been a rush of these fear mongering articles about antique firearms and we wonder whether someone in ACPO has found a new hobby horse to ride after the demise of compulsory identity cards?

2 thoughts on “Media nonsense

  1. nm1049

    A well written and informed reply to an article that stands in stark contrast.

    Another example too of the continuing efforts to attempt to legislate away problems that don’t really exist in the first place – rather than enforce existing law that protects collectors and the public alike.

    Sadly this also raises the question of the quality of journalistic reporting: if a front page article like this can be so inaccurate, poorly informed and misleading – then what confidence does it provide in the other content?

  2. tranter54bore Post author

    Thanks. I’ve come to much the same opinion myself.

    Whenever I read a press report about something I do know something about, it is usually wrong. Therefore I now assume that any report in the yellow press is hopelessly inaccurate if not a complete reversal of the truth!

Leave a Reply